<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michigan Accent &#187; signs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michiganaccent.com/category/signs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michiganaccent.com</link>
	<description>Explaining my accent, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>VDOT not to blame</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2009/03/14/vdot-not-to-blame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2009/03/14/vdot-not-to-blame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganaccent.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last summer I wrote a rather direct post about Virginia&#8217;s Department of Transportation (VDOT) displaying Ozone Alert messages on traffic signs along the highway.  As a result of those messages, traffic is invariably congested (to put it mildly) as people try to figure out how to read and drive at the same time.
I recently learned, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last summer I wrote a <a href="http://www.michiganaccent.com/2008/06/29/vdot-making-slow-traffic-slower/">rather direct post</a> about Virginia&#8217;s Department of Transportation (VDOT) displaying Ozone Alert messages on traffic signs along the highway.  As a result of those messages, traffic is invariably congested (to put it mildly) as people try to figure out how to read and drive at the same time.</p>
<p>I recently learned, however, that VDOT is not to blame.  As it turns out, they are <a href="http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2009/032009/03022009/448429/printer_friendly">legally required to broadcast the Ozone Alert messages</a>.  (They do, however, choose to broadcast Amber Alerts, which I fully appreciate.)  I was also pleased to know that VDOT is aware of the traffic issues caused by messages displayed on the traffic signs (&#8220;everyone &#8230; slows down substantially to read it&#8221;).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming it&#8217;s a state law, but I haven&#8217;t yet been able to track it down.  (Ir)regardless, I owe VDOT an apology.  My frustrations were misplaced, and I will no longer curse VDOT for their sign usage as I&#8217;m stuck in traffic on Ozone Alert days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2009/03/14/vdot-not-to-blame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VDOT: Making Slow Traffic Slower</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2008/06/29/vdot-making-slow-traffic-slower/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2008/06/29/vdot-making-slow-traffic-slower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganaccent.com/2008/06/29/vdot-making-traffic-better-slower/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I left work around 2:00 pm on Friday afternoon, which unfortunately is well after the start of rush hour on Fridays during the summer in Northern Virginia.  One particular stretch of the drive home that&#8217;s always particularly enjoyable is the backup where the highway &#8220;merges&#8221; 2 car pool lanes and 1 on-ramp into an already [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left work around 2:00 pm on Friday afternoon, which unfortunately is well after the start of rush hour on Fridays during the summer in Northern Virginia.  One particular stretch of the drive home that&#8217;s always particularly enjoyable is the backup where the highway &#8220;merges&#8221; 2 car pool lanes and 1 on-ramp into an already full 3 lanes of traffic.  There&#8217;s nothing quite like inching along in a 2 mile backup on hot asphalt in 98 degree weather.</p>
<p>Occasionally traffic will ease up a bit after that merge, but on Friday the congestion remained and we plodded along.  I wasn&#8217;t too surprised, as anything can cause traffic to slow down around here (e.g., a parked car on the side of the road, a new sign, rain, sun, clouds).  This day, however, the additional slowdown was caused by our beloved <a href="http://www.vdot.virginia.gov/">VDOT</a>.  On one of the electronic overhead signs, usually reserved for useless and out-dated traffic information, they had a flashing message alerting us that we were under an Ozone warning, and encouraging us to reduce traffic by carpooling.  As soon as I passed under the sign, traffic sped up and cleared out all the way to my exit.</p>
<p>VDOT <a href="http://www.vdot.virginia.gov/programs/default.asp">claims to have</a> &#8220;numerous initiatives to preserve the  environment while  keeping Virginia moving.&#8221;  And yet they caused tens-of-thousands of cars to idle on the highway for 30 minutes longer than usual because of a pointless sign.  How is that helping the environment <em>or</em> keeping traffic moving?  It seems to me it&#8217;s doing quite the opposite.  Nice work, VDOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2008/06/29/vdot-making-slow-traffic-slower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>gas station boycott</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/01/06/gas-station-boycott/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/01/06/gas-station-boycott/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/01/06/gas-station-boycott/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s no secret that some people are boycotting Citgo for various reasons.  Me?   I&#8217;m avoiding them simply because their gas is too expensive:

Sure, gas is more expensive than it used to be, but $22.60 per gallon for regular and $246 per gallon for premium?!  The decimal points in their prices have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s no secret that some people are <a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/citgo.asp">boycotting Citgo</a> for various reasons.  Me?   I&#8217;m avoiding them simply because their gas is too expensive:</p>
<p align="center"><a class="tt-flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bcp/338371232/"><img style="margin: 5px" alt="122906_16401.jpg" title="122906_16401.jpg" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/148/338371232_9d09b024fb_m.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Sure, gas is more expensive than it used to be, but $22.60 per gallon for regular and $246 per gallon for premium?!  The decimal points in their prices have moved from position to position with each passing price change, though never in the correct place.    It was amusing at first, but after a couple months, I&#8217;m now beginning to wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/01/06/gas-station-boycott/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
