<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: distro switch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/12/02/distro-switch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/12/02/distro-switch/</link>
	<description>Explaining my accent, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcp</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/12/02/distro-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-1905</link>
		<dc:creator>bcp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/12/02/distro-switch/#comment-1905</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It doesn’t seem to work any better than Ubuntu, and costs a LOT more.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can agree with that to a point.  In the things that Ubuntu does, it does them very well.  But there are things it doesn&#039;t do natively that are built-in to OS X.  For me, much of the desire to finally move to a Mac can be summarized as: I&#039;m tired of tinkering with hardware, the OS X apps and tools are extremely polished and generally just work, and they provide better apps in certain areas-- all while still letting me get at the command line when needed.  That&#039;s not to say everything is perfect or bug-free in the OS X world, but to me, it&#039;s worth the investment for something we use so heavily.  But have no fear-- I won&#039;t be getting rid of the Linux box anytime soon. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It doesn’t seem to work any better than Ubuntu, and costs a LOT more.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can agree with that to a point.  In the things that Ubuntu does, it does them very well.  But there are things it doesn&#8217;t do natively that are built-in to OS X.  For me, much of the desire to finally move to a Mac can be summarized as: I&#8217;m tired of tinkering with hardware, the OS X apps and tools are extremely polished and generally just work, and they provide better apps in certain areas&#8211; all while still letting me get at the command line when needed.  That&#8217;s not to say everything is perfect or bug-free in the OS X world, but to me, it&#8217;s worth the investment for something we use so heavily.  But have no fear&#8211; I won&#8217;t be getting rid of the Linux box anytime soon. <img src='http://www.michiganaccent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topher</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/12/02/distro-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-1882</link>
		<dc:creator>Topher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michiganaccent.com/2007/12/02/distro-switch/#comment-1882</guid>
		<description>My history with Linux was very similar to yours, as was my switch.  And I switched for very similar reasons.

I&#039;ve used OS X a bit, and have no compelling reason to move that way.  It doesn&#039;t seem to work any better than Ubuntu, and costs a LOT more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My history with Linux was very similar to yours, as was my switch.  And I switched for very similar reasons.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used OS X a bit, and have no compelling reason to move that way.  It doesn&#8217;t seem to work any better than Ubuntu, and costs a LOT more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

